������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��

“World Heritage sites are of outstanding universal value and occupy less than 1% of the land surface of the Earth. It seems fully justified that they are off-limits for mining and oil operations” said Julia Marton-Lefèvre, Director General of ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��, which is the technical advisory body on natural heritage to the UNESCO World Heritage Convention. “Being declared a World Heritage site is a prestigious recognition, and comes with obligations regarding conservation and protection.”

While ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� welcomes commitments made by some companies or organizations such as the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), the Minerals Advisory Council of Canada and Shell, who have declared they will refrain from any mining operations in World Heritage sites, more needs to be done.

“From a conservation perspective, it is useless to have a company refraining from conducting extraction activities in a World Heritage site only to see another one taking its place“ said Marton-Lefèvre.

Amongst the sites most vulnerable to mining and oil exploration is the Virunga National Park in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Selous Game Reserve in Tanzania, the Alexander von Humboldt National Park in Cuba and Mont Nimba in Côte d’Ivoire.

Congo’s Virunga National Park, famous for one of the last mountain gorilla populations, is highly threatened by oil exploration. The site is already inscribed on the list of World Heritage in Danger. Two other Danger-listed sites in DRC, Kahuzi-Biega National Park and Okapi Wildlife Reserve are also threatened by mining concessions.

������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� has suggested Alexander von Humboldt National Park in Cuba could be deleted from the World Heritage list if the planned mining operations are put into practice. This park is one of the most biologically diverse tropical island sites on Earth with an extraordinary high number of endemic plant and animal species.

In Mont Nimba planned iron mining within Cote d’Ivoire could also lead to the loss of the World Heritage values of the property and lead to a case for deletion from the list.

“There needs to be a level playing field that protects all natural World Heritage sites from all intrusive developments,” said Marton-Lefèvre. “Failure to enforce this principle should be considered as the type of threat which could lead to taking a site off the prestigious World Heritage list.”

To achieve this general commitment, ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� today calls on all private and state mining and oil companies to adopt the no-go commitment within World Heritage sites, and on all signatory governments to enforce this.

Notes to Editors

��

For more information or to set up interviews, please contact

Mario Laguë, Head, ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Communications, +41 79 737 8615
Carolin Wahnbaeck, Media Relations Officer, +41 76 537 0754

��

������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� undertakes technical evaluations of the natural values of the sites nominated for inscription on the World Heritage List and has evaluated several hundred nominated sites. Further information on ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��’s World Heritage work is available at

��

Additionally, each year ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� reports to the World Heritage Centre on the conservation status of certain natural and mixed World Heritage sites under threat. ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��’s assessments on what is happening in World Heritage sites are derived from a variety of sources: ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� members, indigenous peoples groups, the scientific community, experts from ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� commissions and concerned individuals and organizations.

��

��