������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��

In brief

The ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Red List of Ecosystems measures the relative risks of ecosystem collapse for terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems at subnational, national, regional and global scales.

Information provided��

The tool��provides the information below for every ecosystem assessed:

• Ecosystem description with information��on��unique biodiversity�� ("native biota"),��non-living characteristics, such as geology ("abiotic environment"),��key processes,��spatial distribution, and the relation with the��

• Ecosystem diagnosis, based on a model describing the functioning of ecosystems, how��major threats affect ecosystem sustainability and how risks were assessed

• Ecosystem status��which is��assigned depending on the risks identified within each criterion and the overall risk of ecosystem collapse, summarised by the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� risk��category.

• Assessment data, which includes��spatial data,��time series data,��metadata��used to assess the criteria for each ecosystem type

Red List of Ecosystems as a Global Indicator��

Red List of Ecosystems as a Headline Indicator in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework:

The adopted by parties of the , establishing the agenda for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use. This framework sets four primary goals for 2050 and 23 action targets.�� For the first time, a monitoring framework was adopted to ensure continuous progress review, featuring headline, component, and complementary indicators. The Red List of Ecosystems, using the Red List Index for Ecosystems, is a headline indicator for Goal A and Target 1, and also supports Targets 2, 3, and 7.����

While the Red List of Ecosystems has seen rapid uptake across the world over the last decade with full assessments for over 60 countries/territories and over 4000 ecosystems assessed, this inclusion signifies a major step forward. This will result in an expanded and accelerated implementation of the Red List of Ecosystems in each country and globally, to support the monitoring framework, planning and implementation world-wide.��

The ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� risk categories

Users and benefits

Main users

Assessments are usually��carried out by:

• Local and national governments
• Conservation practitioners
• Academic institutions

Assessments can be useful for a variety of other stakeholders��too, such as land use planners and advocates, policymakers, donor agencies and programme developers as well as businesses, companies and investors.

Main applications

The Red List of Ecosystems has many applications, including to assess and highlight risks to ecosystems, guide national and international conservation strategies, prioritise and monitor restoration action, inform land use planning, inform laws and regulations, provide recommendations on how to manage industries, raise public awareness or report on multilateral agreements.

��Learn more about RLE application��​

The RLE partnership

The Red List of Ecosystems is . Founding partners include:��The University of New South Wales,��Deakin University, Arizona State University, Provita,��Wildlife Conservation Society, Coastal Oceans Research and Development,��Conservation International (Colombia), and ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��.

������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��’s involvement

Two ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� bodies have supported the partnership since the inception of the Red List of Ecosystems��in 2008��and the launch of the platform in 2014:��the ��and��the Global Ecosystem Management Programme, now part of ��.

��

Online courses

The RLE partnership benefits from a vibrant learning community and proposes courses for beginners and advanced users:��

• Introduction course -��
  Proposed by Deakin University,��one of RLE partners.
  This��course��takes between 4-6 hours and provides an overview of the tool and the criteria and provides an introduction on the application of RLE.
  ��
• Advanced course -����
  Proposed by the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Academy.��
  This��course takes about 12 hours to complete, and provides in-depth understanding of the RLE methodology, the thresholds, and the calculation methods.��

��