香港六合彩开奖结果现场直播

Article 23 Avr, 2021

New book: Commons institutions and how they work (or not)

CEESP News: byPrateep Kumar Nayak, Editor, and by听Fikret Berkes, University of Manitoba*

Conservation depends on understanding the motivations of people who use biodiversity and practice stewardship. As a shared resource, biodiversity is both a local and a global commons. Commons institutions is what makes sustainability possible. Here commonisation is understood as the process through which a resource becomes jointly used under commons institutions and collective action. Decommonisation refers to the opposite process.听 听

content hero image
Photo: C. Cowan Ros

Andean Indigenous peoples use chaku, a ritualized traditional method to capture herds of vicuna (Vicugna vicugna), a small camelid with very valuable fibre. Once near-extinct, recent commonisation has enabled Indigenous groups to capture, shear, and release vicuna back into the wild, thus conserving populations. From: Chapter 6 by Gabriela Lichtenstein and Carlos Cowan Ros (Photo: C. Cowan Ros).

With an emphasis on the challenges of sustaining the commons across local to global scales,听the new book听鈥:鈥, edited by听Prateep Kumar Nayak,听examines the empirical basis of theorising the concepts of commonisation and decommonisation as a way to understand commons as a process and offers analytical directions for policy and practice that can potentially help maintain commons as commons in the future.

Built Environment, Environment and Sustainability, Geography, Politics & International Relations, Social Sciences
TBD
听 听 听
Focusing on commonisation鈥揹ecommonisation as an analytical framework useful to examine and respond to changes in the commons, the chapter contributions explore how natural resources are commonised and decommonised through the influence of multi-level internal and external drivers, and their implications for commons governance across disparate geographical and temporal contexts.

The book draws from a large number of geographically diverse empirical cases 鈥 20 countries in North, South, and Central America and South- and South-East Asia. They involve a wide range of commons 鈥 related to fisheries, forests, grazing, wetlands, coastal-marine, rivers and dams, aquaculture, wildlife, tourism, groundwater, surface freshwater, mountains, small islands, social movements, and climate.

is a transdisciplinary endeavour with contributions by scholars from geography, history, sociology, anthropology, political studies, planning, human ecology, cultural and applied ecology, environmental and development studies, environmental science and technology, public policy, Indigenous/tribal studies, Latin American and Asian studies, and environmental change and governance, and authors representing the commons community, NGOs, and policy.

Contributors include academics, community members, NGOs, practitioners, and policymakers. Therefore, commonisation鈥揹ecommonisation lessons drawn from these chapters are well suited for contributing to the practice, policy, and theory of the commons, both locally and globally.

New Book: 鈥淢aking Commons Dynamic: Understanding Change Through Commonisation and Decommonisation鈥
C. Cowan Ros
听 听 听

The live-shearing of endangered vicunas helped conserve the wild populations and at the same time created income for Indigenous Peoples.听From: Chapter 6 by Gabriela Lichtenstein and Carlos Cowan Ros (Photo: C. Cowan Ros).听The听film linked to here听shows how Andean Indigenous Peoples听capture, shear, and release vicuna back into the wild, thus conserving populations. 听

From the Preface to 鈥淢aking Commons Dynamic鈥

鈥淚ndividuals, communities and nations in all regions of the world are experiencing the effects of human-induced changes in their physical and social environments. The highest and the most direct impact of these changes are seen in the case of commons (e.g., fisheries, shellfish beds, coastal spaces, lagoons, mangroves, range lands, forests, groundwater, freshwater systems, irrigation systems, urban spaces, etc.) upon which humans depend for their social, cultural and economic needs.鈥

鈥淲e all, as humans, are linked to some form of commons in our daily lives 鈥 we either impact the commons or get impacted by it or experience both. As a result, sustaining the commons remains an ongoing challenge that requires enhanced understanding and innovative approaches鈥 These relationships, interactions and connections between the biophysical and the social (institutional) (sub)systems exposing the complexities in these commons in numerous ways. Forests stand in a place but fish continue to swim; to imagine those diverse things and the manner in which they manifest as commons is not easy.鈥

鈥淭here is no single approach to comprehend the complex intertwining of the multiple components that make or break the commons, and none of these are bound by time and space. To strive to understand and define the commons as something or the other, to put a shape and a dimension to how commons might look like, and to propose a fixed set of rules that can guide how commons might develop, are not only unrealistic but simply impossible propositions. This is why the book defines commons as a multidimensional, complex and continuous process and, to do so, it uses commonisation and decommonisation as novel perspectives.鈥

鈥淭his book is dedicated to all those millions of commoners, in every corner of this world, who tirelessly work to maintain their commons as commons for the future generations.鈥

For more information or media interviews:听Prateep Kumar Nayak听can be reached via听email.

*听Dr. Fikret Berkes is Distinguished Professor Emeritus at the Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, Canada. Dr. Berkes鈥 work deals with social-ecological resilience, commons, co-management, and local and traditional ecological knowledge. His eleven books include听Advanced Introduction to Community-based Conservation听(Edward Elgar, 2021) and Sacred Ecology听(4 th 听edition, Routledge, 2018).