������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��

Recently, the , the -funded and -led , and the at Oxford University's co-hosted an Hundreds of delegates with a variety of backgrounds participated in sessions with the shared goals of: facilitating dialogue, generating interdisciplinary understandings of the most recent methodologies and ideas, and identifying and developing means of addressing gaps in effective human-wildlife conflict (HWC) management. 

were launched on the first day of the conference and are now available for reading. These precede the development of a framework that will support progress on Target 4 of the recently adopted Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). In order to create robust engagement, policy, and capacity for efficient management, a working group will convene to discuss the future of HWC monitoring metrics. In several countries, various levels of impact-monitoring are already in place but assessing indirect challenges like opportunity and health costs have proven more difficult to assess. 

There was consensus about the interdisciplinary nature of human-wildlife conflict and the need to put communities at the heart of this work. Lisa Farroway, Senior Environmental Specialist and Manager at the World Bank’s Global Wildlife Program acknowledged that “human-wildlife conflict is a development issue…oftentimes with catastrophic economic consequences.” While there is widespread recognition of the importance of traditional knowledge and Indigenous understandings, there seems to also be a need for more incorporation of these into projects and management plans. John Kamanga, Director of the South Rift Association of Land Owners, spoke about “decriminalizing communities” in the context of human wildlife conflict work. By doing so, we may be able to provide greater opportunities for coexistence. 

�ճ���� is keen to collaborate across sectors and is currently seeking cooperation across their specialist groups, themes, and wider ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Commissions.