������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��

Risks and opportunities of using synthetic biology in nature conservation

The Convention on Biological Diversity defines synthetic biology as “a further development and new dimension of modern biotechnology that combines science, technology and engineering to facilitate and accelerate the understanding, design, redesign, manufacture and/or modification of genetic materials, living organisms and biological systems”.

This is important for nature conservation.

On the one hand, synthetic biology could impose new risks for nature. Implemented or governed poorly, it could, for example, introduce unwanted genetic traits into native species, jeopardising their persistence. Other risks could be indirect, such as through use of synthetic biology to open new agricultural frontiers, threatening biodiversity through land conversion.

On the other hand, synthetic biology could open new opportunities for nature conservation. For instance, it may offer solutions to currently unsolvable threats to biodiversity, such as those caused by invasive alien species and diseases. Such opportunities could also be indirect, perhaps through allowing sustainable intensification of agriculture and thus reducing pressure on natural ecosystems elsewhere.

��

Challenges in developing a policy on synthetic biology and nature

Shaping a coherent nature conservation policy on synthetic biology is challenging for multiple reasons. The technology is expanding extremely rapidly. Collaboration between countries is essential, as is collaboration across levels of governance from indigenous peoples and local communities through to multilateral environmental agreements. The subject is complex, and misconceptions are rife. Maybe most challenging, the issue is highly polarised across the conservation community (and society as a whole), with small proportions of conservationists strongly opposed to or supportive of the technology, and many as-yet-un-decided what the best policies might be.

��

������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��’s process to date in developing its policy for synthetic biology and nature conservation

At the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� World Conservation Congress in Hawai‘i, USA, in September 2016, ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Members adopted WCC . This Resolution mandated the development and publication of an assessment on synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation, under the authority of the Chairs of all six of ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��’s independent expert Commissions, and the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Director General.

This assessment was published in 2019 as “”, with an accompanying “” for policy-makers.

Building from this, the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� World Conservation Congress in Marseille, France, in September 2021 adopted WCC , establishing a process for development of an ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� policy, to include both an inclusive process across the Union and the appointment of a Policy Development Working Group.

������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Council deliberated the Resolution at . Their Decision C108/2 approved both a detailed process for implementation of the Resolution, and Terms of Reference for specific bodies to be involved.

������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Council further discussed the process in their , and their Decision C109/8 approved a revised ��for implementation of the Resolution and revised for the specific bodies involved. This documentation adds specification to the details of the inclusive process (including for it to encompass a “Citizens’ Assembly” established through stratified random selection from across the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Membership, and now underway) and of the Policy Development Working Group.��The process of appointment of the Policy Development Working Group members ran from June through October 2023, with appointments finalised by the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� President on 13 October 2023. The was recruited, through the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� procurement process, to provide training and facilitation services to the process.

The inclusive and participatory process comprised the following phases:

1. was run from June through August 2023.
2. The ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Citizens’ Assembly on Synthetic Biology in relation to Nature Conservation convened participants from ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Members selected in a stratified random fashion according to Member category, Statutory region, and gender. It undertook a training workshop in Nairobi, Kenya, 19–26 November 2023, followed by a deliberation workshop in Bangkok, Thailand, 21–28 February 2024, where it produced recommendations for the Policy Development Working Group.
3. The production of a , an , and a on what synthetic biology is and why its implications for nature conservation require inclusive debate. These are available to all ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Members on ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Engage (login required).
4. Solicitation of feedback from all ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� constituents 15 March 2024 – 31 May 2024, in particular through the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� National, Regional, and Interregional Committees, the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Regional Conservation Fora, the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Commissions, and the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Indigenous Peoples’ Organisation Members, with ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Engage providing a feedback template for ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� constituents to share their inputs.
5. Further solicitation of feedback from all ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� constituents 11 July 2024 – 16 August 2024, with ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Engage again providing a feedback template for ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� constituents to share their inputs.

������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� is very grateful to all constituents who participated in the inclusive and participatory process.

Meanwhile, the Policy Development Working Group met 26 February – 2 March 2024 to develop a first draft policy, on the basis of the Citizens’ Assembly recommendations and other inputs as specified in WCC 2020 Res 123. This underwent ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Union-wide peer review 15 March – 26 April 2024, receiving 391 comments. The Policy Development Working Group met for a second time 17–22 June 2024, comprehensively revising the policy to produce a second draft on the basis of the peer review comments and the feedback received through the inclusive and participatory process, and documenting point-by-point how each comment was addressed. The second draft policy then underwent ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Union-wide peer review 11 July – 16 August 2024, receiving 430 comments. The Policy Development Working Group them met for a third time 16–21 September 2024, again comprehensively revising the policy to produce a third draft on the basis of the peer review comments and the feedback received through the inclusive and participatory process, and again documenting point-by-point how each comment was addressed. In accordance with WCC 2020 Res 123, the third-draft policy has now been transmitted to ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Council which will transmit it, through a motion, to the next meeting of the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� World Conservation Congress for debate and potential adoption by the Members of ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ��.

Funding for development of the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� policy on synthetic biology and nature conservation

To date, generous contributions towards funding the development of the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� policy on synthetic biology and nature conservation have been provided by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection of the Government of Germany, and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. More generally, the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Council has endorsed a request for financial support in implementing the Resolution, sent by the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Director General to ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Government Members and philanthropic foundations. This��solicitation remains open to ensure sufficient resource mobilisation, with the anticipation that a draft ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Policy on Synthetic Biology and Nature Conservation is ready for consideration by the ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� Membership at the 2025 ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� World Conservation Congress.

Importantly, ������ϲʿ�������ֳ�ֱ�� is not approaching private sector and campaigning organisations for financial support, to reduce any risk of perceived conflict of interest.

��